It is imperative that before discussing the arguments against Calvin’s notion of election from both Arminius and Wesley’s standpoint that we first reflect on the true intentions behind Cavin’s magnum opus body of work titled “The Institutes of the Christian Religion” These institutes are ultimately the source of tension as well as all the differentiating protestant beliefs about “Election” and “Predestination” However when Calvin wrote these institutes, he meant for them to be an instructional manual on the concept of “godliness” and “edification” for the reformed believers and not necessary as theological Christian doctrine. Calvin had a pastoral heart and his main concern for the believer during his time was advocating and facilitating their advancement in biblical literacy and understanding. He strove to do this through a systematic concept that would enhance believers' ability to study, interpret and understand scripture from his perspective. So what Calvin was striving to do in the Institute's pertaining to his explanation of election and predestination was to systematically exegete this subject using humanist hermeneutics from what he understood scripture to be saying about it. So, what did he understand about that election which he and Arminius deemed a crucial topic in religion?